Indian Harbor Ins. Co. v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.No. B192829, 2007 WL 2955564, at *7 (Cal. Ct. App. (2d Dist.) Oct. 7, 2007) ("The allegations [in ¶¶ 28, 29 and 30 of the Adidas complaint] are not limited in time or by product line and potentially cover Skechers's advertising activities during the period covered by Hartford's policy. . . . Skechers also provided Hartford with a 1998-1999 catalog that advertised, during Hartford's policy period, allegedly infringing Skechers footwear described in the Adidas complaint.").
|