False Advertising Products as Patented Covered

Elcom Technologies v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest, 991 F. Supp. 1294 (D. Utah 1997) (applying Pennsylvania law).  
False advertising claim in suit for intellectual property claiming that Elcom improperly marketed its products as patented when they were not, triggers coverage under "advertising injury" offense of "misappropriation of advertising ideas or style of doing business."